Exploring Relationships - Interpersonal
Yoga (page 5)
1
| 2
| 3 | 4
| 5 |
6
People often use values to justify their desires or feelings
and this keeps them from listening. Values used in this
fashion can actually make you more insensitive. For example,
if you are feeling caged in and want more freedom, you espouse
a value system with freedom and self-sufficiency as the
ideals. Then rather than responding to the hurt in your
mate's jealousy, you discount their feelings as either overly
dependent or self-centered, and try to convince them they
shouldn't feel that way or you make them feel guilty for
tying you down and being possessive. ("Self-centered,"
"dependent" and "possessive" are value-laden
words.)
Each person may have different needs for growth or fulfillment
at any stage in the relationship. One of the most common
problems in a couple occurs when one person wants more time
and freedom to explore outside interests, while the other
wants more intimacy and time together. Each position could
easily find values to support and reinforce itself as the
way to be, such as, "Openness should not be limited,''
versus "Scattering yourself in too many places is superficial
and prevents depth." Feeling that your way is superior
keeps you from seeing how each stance (in this case the
"external-exploratory" versus the "relationship
focused") can be valuable for the relationship. These
two seemingly opposed positions could actually complement
and balance each other: the one brings newness in from the
outside, keeping interest alive; the other focuses and centers
the relationship, giving it continuity and depth. To achieve
this balance, each side must accept and appreciate the other's
feelings and point of view, letting go of the pleasures
of feeling superior and righteous.
Clarifying the problem doesn't automatically reveal a solution,
though it may. A knot may either disappear, remain in an
altered form, or reveal itself to be a real "impasse."
You can only distinguish a knot from an impasse if you go
into it and unravel it to its core. Unraveling a knot often
leaves nothing there, whereas in an impasse there are fundamental
differences at the core, perhaps a basic conflict as to
what direction or form the relationship should take, that
at the time seems to be unresolvable. If it's an impasse,
it becomes important to live with it, carefully observing
it and getting acquainted with all its nooks and crannies,
instead of trying to get rid of it or wishing it away. Resisting
an impasse tends to perpetuate it. Once the rigidities of
the supporting value systems are removed, impasses can change.
Exploring not only your own emotional states, but also being
sensitive to the other's, can be a form of yoga which may
open things up unexpectedly and in surprising ways, as yoga
often does. This can allow real contact, even in the midst
of discord.
Anger and "Clean Communication"
Anger, which may be coating hurt, usually contains an
element of "getting even," a barb of pain. When
you've been hurt, there's an automatic tendency to want
to retaliate. Pain breeds pain. You may hurt the other under
the guise of honesty and openness, without realizing consciously
what your intent is. (One is, for the most part, not aware
of this vindictive aspect in oneself.) Self-righteousness,
stemming from feeling you've been "wronged," accompanies
and fuels anger, which makes getting back at the other seem
warranted. Anger is like a loop that feeds and justifies
itself through blame. There is also great energy and sometimes
even pleasure in it, which makes it harder to let go of.
If, when angry, you recognize your impulse to get even
and at the same time realize this will close communication
by feeding the endless cycle of hurt and anger, that very
perception alters the situation. Simple rules, such as "emotions
must be fully expressed," do not apply. It's true that
if you habitually bottle up your anger and internalize it,
it will be physically harmful to you and create a potential
explosive backlog of unfinished business. Since you cant
hide anger for long, it will come out in more indirect and
insidious ways anyway. But on the other hand, if you unleash
it unawarely and vindictively, you close the other to hearing
you. To keep communication open, there is an edge that must
be played between expressing and releasing anger, and holding
it back. If your real motive is to punish, blame or make
the other person feel guilty, he or she will sense this
and close down to you. If, however, you are more interested
in communicating how you feel and what you think is going
on (including your contribution to it), this may open the
other up to hearing you. Once again, it's not simple, for
just as truth can be used as a weapon, anger and hurt can
be used subtly to manipulate and control. Seeing your true
motivation - whether you're more interested in being heard
(and hearing), or in getting your way or retaliating - is
crucial.
One might be surprised how many daily interactions, rather
than stemming from openness, are geared toward winning,
impressing, or being right. It's essential to be aware of
these tendencies in yourself because ultimately your real
intentions, conscious or unconscious, are what matter most
of all. In all forms of yoga, the process is greatly affected
by your motives and also by awareness, which includes awareness
of your motives. Where you're coming from is the source
of what you do. In physical yoga, the most important element
is the quality of attention you bring to the postures while
using them as tools or structures to explore your body.
This is also true in interpersonal yoga. There are guidelines
that may help open up communication that can be looked on
as relational tools. Although some of these techniques are
not new, approaching them from a yogic point of view can
give them new meaning.
Many communication guidelines involve giving and receiving
unpleasant feedback in a way that minimizes defensiveness.
This is what I call "clean communication" and
it is essential for working out with each other. The time
when it's most important, of course, is just when it's most
difficult: when you feel angry, hurt, jealous or threatened.
The more cleanly you express these feelings, the easier
it is to be heard, since good feedback tries to cut through
resistances, conditioning, and reactions that hinder listening.
Defensiveness automatically implies closing down, fortifying
boundaries and building a case for self-justification. Reducing
defensiveness requires care: paying attention to the words
you choose (particularly avoiding subtle ways of criticizing),
developing a sense of timing and ways of approaching difficult
topics, and becoming attuned to the non-verbal nuances of
reaction. Sincerely examining your own role in the problem
is, of course, essential.
Staying in touch with your feelings can also help: instead
of telling the other person what's wrong with them, you
can say how what they do makes you feel. Here you're not
demanding that the other change, but rather giving information
on how they affect you. This in turn leaves you open to
their telling you how what you do affects them, but that's
part of opening up, too. In this way you can both learn
something new about each other. If you say, "When you
don't pick up after yourself it's hard for me to work in
such an environment," this doesn't imply the other
is wrong for not being neater or that you are superior.
In fact, you could build a value system to defend either
"neat" or "messy" behavior: if one says,
"What you call 'messy' is really just being loose and
natural, while your 'neatness' is tight and compulsive,"
the other could retort, "A centered person is more
orderly, for how you are inside is reflected outside."
Knots form around differences when each person, using values,
tries to prove the other wrong. It's easier to live with
and iron out differences if values don't get in the way.
How you feel is a fact, in itself neither right nor wrong.
By expressing your feelings, you lessen the chances of getting
bogged down in theoretical discussions on values, intent
or motives. You can always disagree with interpretations
and value judgments, but not with how another person is
feeling. Negative feedback, given cleanly, is an opening
that leaves the giver potentially vulnerable and thus implies
he or she is willing to put time and energy into the relationship.
Giving difficult or unpleasant feedback can be looked upon
a a gift that could open your relationship up in new areas
and smooth undercurrents of tension. Seeing this feedback
as a gift, instead of an attack, makes it easier to receive
as well as to give.
1 |
2 | 3
| 4 | 5
| 6
|